I chose to write about this article because it talks about a very important point about A.I. in the art world specifically. It brings up a point that is commonly talked about in the art world involving A.I. which is that A.I. could replace artists. After reading this article it became clear to me that A.I. is not something that will replace artists but instead it is a tool that could help many artists in different ways. In the article it mentions that A.I. is able to create the base of an art piece as a starting point and the heavy lifting is done by the artist. It also talks about other ways it could be used for example like assisting the artist in modifying, editing a piece or improving the work that had already been created by the artist itself. I think people who say that A.I. will replace artists, have truly never even used A.I. before or understands how it truly works. The point of being an artist is to experiment and to be open minded to trying out new methods of creating. If the artist does not experiment at all then are they even an artist? An artist should use the tools they have to their advantage and master them to the point that they are no longer masterable. Another discussion that is brought up in this article is the fact that anyone can make A.I. art. Well i could also say that anyone can make art but does that mean that anyone can make great interesting unique art? Well no not everyone can and same goes with A.I. generated work. You still need to be interesting enough and creative to make great work out of A.I. The artist has to understand how to manipulate A.I. to make it interesting for themselves. My point is that A.I. should not be taken as a threat that will destroy the art world but instead a tool that can be used by artists in many ways.